Building a conceptual frame for MoRM
Its form — an itinerant, ephemeral architecture
A foundation for an open, participatory process …
… selecting, seeing, naming, deleting.
This workshop extends the ideas developed last year in the Creating Future Memories workshop and exhibitions. This year’s MORM will be a second, remixed edition of the MORM exhibit held at CounterPlay 2016.
Image by Dalida Maria Benfield. We take a lot of verbal and visual notes during our Skype meetings, so these images reflect some of that ‘in progress’ sensemaking.
What should it look like, this iteration of MoRM in 2017?
In the first iteration of the project, we approached potential participants with a brief description of the Museum, followed by the prompt, asking them to “Give us something useless”. This solicited many things, a laugh almost always, and then, diverse physical objects, from an empty pill card to a drawing, a recollection of a dream. There were also instances in which the political moment emerged in the participants’ choices and descriptions of their contribution. In some cases quite explicit references were made to un- and underemployment, racism, gender discrimination, and the ravages of drugs, to name only a few. This was, however, more contingent than anything else; not planned for; and when these things emerged, treated as just one more instance, no more and no less, of the unexamined flow of the everyday.
Now with the advantage of hindsight, this seems an obvious critical blindness. In fact, these moments, taken together, are perhaps the single most important thing that the earlier version of the project told us, namely that our everyday lives are shot through with questions of politics and history; and now perhaps we need to rethink the Museum’s purpose as providing the space for framing and reflection of each of our relative positions to these larger questions. Certainly, this is an inversion of the Museum as we know it, which typically normalizes and conceals these questions in the name of a greater social whole. We think that critical reflection — open-ended, dialogical, irreverent, playful, all or some or more of these things — is particularly urgent given the ascendency of authoritarian movements, in the U.S. and elsewhere, and their common reliance on discourses that are both monological and magical, eschewing analysis and criticality.
We wanted to take a brief detour through a work, a film, that is exemplary in engaging its subject in just such an oppositional exercise, Chronicle of a Summer (1961), by Jean Rouch and Edgar Morin. The premise of the movie is simple, a series of interviews in which the filmmakers ask people a single question: “Are you happy?” The people include Parisian students, both black and white, some facing the military draft in the Algerian war; an impoverished Italian immigrant; a would be actress. Rouch, one of the great experimenters in film and its relationship to ethnography, and his collaborator, Morin, a sociologist, encourage the interviewees to reflect on their lives and connect their experience to larger questions. “Happiness”, in the work, becomes the marker for the enervated condition of the individual living in the long shadow of the Nazi occupation, collusion in the Holocaust, and most immediately for that period, France’s brutal colonial war in Algeria.
This all brings us to the performative question of the Museum, in particular the “prompt,” or how in the next version of the project we solicit from its participants a fuller representation of their lived experience — to better delineate the complex fields of politics, history and subjectivity. “Happiness” might not be the best way to enter the conversation, but with Chronicle of a Summer in mind, it may be worthwhile to think of some equally simple and unassuming approach to what can reveal the full scale of people’s present circumstance, and by doing so, the pervasive social conditions under which we collectively live. We think this also underscores the important role played by our temporary/permanent staff, the (un)curators, (de)conservators, and others who engaged with the participants and move them through the process — and hopefully, together discover an analysis.
How, then, to refine our prompt, our approach generally, and develop the role of Museum staff, all towards greater social inquiry and political discovery?
follow-up here by Annette Markham